Lattice masts, or cage masts, or basket masts, are a type of observation mast common on United States Navy major warships in the early 20th century. They are a type of hyperboloid structure, whose weight-saving design was invented by the Russian engineer Vladimir Shukhov. They were used most prominently on American dreadnought and of the World War I era.
In the age of sail, masts were required to support the sails, and lookouts were posted on them; with the advent of engine-powered warships, masts were retained and used for observation and to spot fall of shot. The purpose of the lattice structure was to make the posts less vulnerable to shells from enemy ships, and to better absorb the shock caused by firing heavy guns, isolating the delicate fire control equipment (rangefinders, etc.) mounted on the mast tops. However, the masts were found to be easily damaged by the inclement weather experienced at sea by naval ships during typhoons and hurricanes: s mast was bent right down to the deck by such a storm in 1918. As the caliber and range of ships' guns increased, heavier rangefinders were required, and the powerful guns and engines created shock and vibrations; lattice masts were eventually phased out in favor of the more rigid favoured by the Royal Navy.
During 1912, gunnery tests were carried out by the US Navy Department on a lattice or basket mast specially installed on the San Marcos (formerly ), to see how capable the design was of withstanding sustained gunfire.Wright, p. 164 The mast was prefabricated in the Norfolk navy yard and shipped out for installation.
In January 1918, the lattice foremast of the battleship collapsed in a severe storm; the heavy seas put excessive stress on the mast and the weight of the fire control equipment caused the mast to fail at the narrowest point. The incident spurred an investigation by the Bureau of Construction and Repair, which found that the failure was likely because the mast had been lengthened, with a new section spliced in where the mast broke.Wright, p. 160 In addition, fragments from a recent explosion in one of the ship's guns had damaged the mast, and the damage had not been adequately repaired. Nevertheless, the investigation also found that the mast aboard the battleship also showed signs of buckling. Throughout the 1920s and 1930s, the Navy repeatedly found evidence of structural problems in the masts, in large part due to the corrosive effects of funnel gases.Friedman, p. 177
At the same time as the Michigan incident, US Navy officers were also gaining experience with British for the first time while serving with the Grand Fleet during World War I. Unlike lattice masts, the heavier tripods did not suffer from vibration when steaming at high speed, and they were not as susceptible to shock from gunfire, which caused the lattice masts to whip from the concussion.Friedman, p. 195
All American battleships up to the battleships (1921–1923) were equipped with lattice masts, although in the 1920s to 1930s, the older battleships had their lattice masts replaced with more modern tripod masts, concomitant with the addition of larger, much heavier fire-control director tops.Hore, p. 60 The newer and Colorado classes retained their original lattice masts, of heavier construction than those on earlier ships, at the start of World War II.
Some navies considered lattice masts for their ships. Following their experience with the Andrei Pervozvannys, the four Russian s, initially designed with lattice masts, were constructed with pole ones.Hythe, pp. 351–352 (Plates 57–58)Melnikov, p. 24 The German Imperial Navy designed its first battlecruiser, , with lattice masts, but she was instead completed with pole masts.Staff, p. 8
Use in other navies
Use in fortifications
Notes
|
|